Institutions
Standards
Accreditation
Program Review
State Protocols
State Contact Directory
BOE Visits
Policies
Handbook
Fee Schedule
Accreditation Decisions Beginning in 2010
Member Login
Meeting professional standards is an indicator of a quality program that prospective students look for when seeking an institution at which to study.
   more testimonials
Upcoming Web-seminars
Highlights from 2008 Survey of NCATE Institutions
 
About NCATE Standards List of Accredited Institutions Publications Contact Directory Site Map
Preconditions
Preconditions 2009
The preconditions that must be met by institutions seeking accreditation for the first time have been reduced in number from eight to six. New institutions submitting preconditions within the next year (by February 1, 2010) have the option to use either the previous set of eight preconditions (Preconditions prior to 2009) listed below or the new set of six preconditions (Preconditions 2009).
Adobe PDF Document Sample Conceptual Frameworks for 2009 Preconditions
Read more about the new set of preconditions...

Preconditions prior to 2009
 List of Preconditions and Documentation
 Format for Submission
 Deadlines
 Frequently Asked Questions
 Sample Conceptual Frameworks
 MS Word Document Checklist for Submission of Conceptual Frameworks
 Frequently Cited Concerns About Precondition #4
 
 
Updated March 16, 2010
List of Preconditions and Documentation

The preconditions ensure that an education unit seeking NCATE accreditation for the first time has met fundamental requirements that undergird NCATE’s standards for accreditation. The eight preconditions and the documentation that must be submitted to show that the preconditions are met are outlined below.

After an education unit has established itself as a precandidate by filing an "Intent to Seek NCATE Accreditation" form, it should submit its preconditions report to the NCATE office approximately three semesters prior to its planned BOE visit (by September 15 of the previous academic year for spring visits and by February 1 of the previous calendar year for fall visits). It is very important that NCATE be notified prior to submission of the preconditions report (by August 15 for a September 15 submission and by January 1 for a February 1 submission). Documentation for Precondition #4, the conceptual framework, is reviewed by members of the Annual Report and Preconditions Audit (ARPA) Committee at its next scheduled meeting; other documentation is reviewed by NCATE staff. The committee and staff may find that (1) all of the preconditions have been met or (2) not all of the preconditions have been met. In the first case, candidacy will be recommended to the Unit Accreditation Board; in the second case, the institution will be asked to submit additional or revised documentation.

Institutions may be invited to resubmit their conceptual framework to the ARPA Committee twice, for a total of three submissions. If the third attempt does not meet the requirements, the institution is asked to wait a year before submitting its conceptual framework for consideration.

After the ARPA Committee meeting, NCATE will send the institution a preconditions report indicating whether preconditions have been met. Precondition #7 is considered met after all required program reports have been submitted. If some preconditions are not met, the report will request additional information.

Education units must be accepted into candidacy at least one semester before the scheduled visit. Candidates for accreditation must (1) have an accreditation visit within five years of the semester in which candidacy is granted by the Unit Accreditation Board and must maintain other requirements for candidacy, which include (2) filing of parts A and B of the annual report and (3) payment of the annual candidacy fee. (Institutions that delay their accreditation by more than two years beyond inception of candidacy may be required to resubmit preconditions and/or program reports if major revisions in preconditions or program standards have occurred.)

 

Precondition #1. The institution recognizes and identifies a professional education unit that has responsibility and authority for the preparation of teachers and other professional education personnel.

1.1 A letter from the institution’s chief executive officer that designates the unit as having primary authority and responsibility for teacher education programs.

1.2 A chart or narrative that lists all professional education programs offered by the institution (including any nontraditional/alternative programs). The chart or narrative report should depict (a) the degree or award levels for each program; (b) the administrative location for each program—for example, School of Education, Department of Music; and (c) the structure or structures through which the unit implements its oversight of all programs. If the unit’s offerings include off-campus programs, a separate chart or narrative as described above should be prepared for each location at which off-campus programs are geographically located.

1.3 An organizational chart of the institution that depicts the professional education unit and indicates the unit’s relationship to other administrative units within the college or university.

Precondition #2. A dean, director, or chair is officially designated as head of the unit and is assigned the authority and responsibility for its overall administration and operation.

2.1 The job description for the head of the professional education unit.

Precondition #3. Written policies and procedures guide the operations of the unit.

3.1 The cover page and table of contents for the documents that contain codified policies and procedures for the unit’s operations, including policies and procedures pertaining to its candidates. [If policies and procedures are located on the Internet, photocopies of appropriate web page(s) that indicate links to applicable policies and procedures may be submitted as documentation for this precondition.]

Precondition #4. The unit has a well developed conceptual framework that establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work in P–12 schools and provides direction for programs, courses, teaching, candidate performance, scholarship, service, and unit accountability.

4.1 The vision and mission of the institution and unit.

4.2 The unit’s philosophy, purposes, and goals.

4.3 Knowledge bases, including theories, research, the wisdom of practice, and education policies, that inform the unit’s conceptual framework.

4.4 Candidate proficiencies aligned with the expectations in professional, state, and institutional standards.

4.5 A description of the unit’s system for evaluating its operations, the quality of its offerings, the performance of candidates on proficiencies described in 4.4, and the effectiveness of its graduates.

Precondition #5. The unit has published criteria for admission to and exit from all initial teacher preparation and advanced programs and can provide summary reports of candidate performance at exit.

5.1 A photocopy of published documentation (e.g., from a catalog, student teaching handbook, application form, or web page) listing the basic requirements for entry to, retention in, and completion of professional education programs offered by the institution, including any nontraditional/alternative and off-campus programs.

5.2 A brief summary of candidate performance on assessments conducted for admission into programs and exit from them. This summary should include (a) the portion of Title II documentation related to candidate admission and completion that was prepared for the state and (b) compilation of results on the unit’s own assessments.

Precondition #6. The unit’s programs are approved by the appropriate state agency or agencies, and, in states with educator licensing examinations and required pass rates, the unit’s summary pass rate meets or exceeds the required state pass rate.

6.1 The most recent state approval letters, including or appended by a list of approved programs. If any program is not approved, the unit must provide a statement that it is not currently accepting new applicants into the non-approved program(s). For programs that are approved with qualifications or are pending approval, the unit must describe how it will bring the program(s) into compliance.

Precondition #7. If the institution is located in a non-partner state or in a partner state that requires the submission of program reports for national review through NCATE, the unit has committed to submitting program reports for each program for which NCATE has approved program standards at least one year prior to the visit.

7.1 A list of program reports that will be submitted to NCATE one year prior to the visit. For additional information, see the Handbook section, “Responding to Program Standards” and the program review section of this website.

Precondition #8. The institution is accredited, without probation or an equivalent status, by the appropriate institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

8.1.a. Current accreditation letter and/or report that indicates institutional accreditation[1] status.

OR

8.1.b. Providers ineligible for institutional accreditation must submit a clean audit, a business plan, and the answers to the following questions:

  1. What security measures are taken by the unit to ensure the security and integrity of student records?
  2. What documentation does the unit have to demonstrate that facilities are safe, secure, and healthy?
  3. What are the unit's policies that ensure the availability of information about governing board members, faculty, and administrators?
  4. What are the unit's policies related to requirements for degrees, certificates, and graduation; fees and other financial obligations of students; conflicts of interest; and non-discrimination and sexual harassment?
  5. Are the unit’s support services sufficiently staffed by qualified personnel?
  6. What are the unit's policies related to faculty tenure, grievance, and discipline?
  7. What are the policies related to academic and intellectual freedoms?

Non-university providers must also submit:

  1. Clean independent audits of a full set of financial statements of the legal entity offering educator preparation programs for the three years prior to submission of the "Intent to Seek NCATE Accreditation Form." The audits should meet the standards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or other appropriate accounting standards generally accepted in the U.S.
  2. The legal entity’s 990 Form (for non-profits) or corporate income tax returns (for for-profits) for the past year.
  3. A business plan that focuses on the unit being accredited. The business plan should include:
    • A business model that briefly describes the services to be delivered, the area to be served, the current and projected number of candidates, recruitment activities, a description of faculty, tuition costs, a budget narrative, etc.;
    • The most current approved budget;
    • Revenue and expense projections for the next two years, including funding streams, the length and percentage of funding from foundation grants, appropriated governmental funds, tuition, funds from elsewhere in the legal entity or its affiliates; costs of facility, payroll, maintenance, etc.;
    • A one to two page narrative describing revenue and expenditure projections for the next 4 years;
    • A one to two page narrative describing the relationship between the unit and the legal entity offering the educator preparation programs; and
    • If tuition based, the tuition refund policy should the educator preparation programs be discontinued.
  4. Annual tax statements. The Financial Review Committee will review these statements in the fall of each year and submit a report to the UAB detailing its findings.

1. Please confirm ineligibility for institutional accreditation with NCATE staff. This documentation will be reviewed by the Annual Report and Preconditions Audit (ARPA) Committee.

back to the top back to the top 
 
 
Updated September 8, 2009
 
Format for Preconditions Submissions
Preconditions should be submitted to NCATE electronically. The guidelines below should assist an institution in preparing its preconditions submission.
 
General Guidelines for All Submissions:
  • Number all pages consecutively, including appendices, attachments, etc.
  • Use a consistent font size throughout the entire document.
  • Include a table of contents indicating where documentation for each precondition can be found.
  • Label each supporting document to match the documentation outlined in the preconditions table (e.g., 1.2, 4.3, or 7.1).
  • Submit relevant pages of source documents rather than the full document; do not submit entire catalogs or other extraneous documents.
  • Indicate on source documents (1) the name of the source document (e.g., Faculty Handbook) and (2) the date of the source document.
  • Ensure that documentation for each precondition, especially Precondition #4, can stand on its own without the documentation for other preconditions.
  • Include a list of the program reports that are being submitted for Precondition #7. The program reports, if submitted, must be submitted as separate documents. If the institution is located in a state that does not require the submission of program review documents, the response to Precondition #7 should indicate the terms of the state partnership agreement regarding program report submission.
  • The institution should have one copy of the preconditions submission in the exhibit room during the on-site visit.
 
Guidelines for Submissions
The preconditions are to be submitted by uploading the files into NCATE‘s database (AIMS), using the following guidelines:
  • Once an education unit has been established as a precandidate (by submission of an "Intent to Seek NCATE Accreditation" form) and after NCATE has received notifications of plans to submit preconditions, a workspace in AIMS will be set up for the education unit. Directions specific to uploading into AIMS (e.g., URL, Login ID, Password for access to the AIMS workspace, etc.) will be emailed at that time.
  • Precondition #4, the conceptual framework, should be submitted as one file, and the other preconditions should be submitted as a separate file or files. If the file sizes are large, it might be necessary to upload each attachment as a separate file.
  • Upload the submissions in a format that can be read in either Word or PDF when received at the NCATE office.
  • Scanned letters (PDF format) are acceptable for the documentation requiring copies of letters.
 
back to the top back to the top 
 
 
 
Updated May 8, 2009
Deadlines
If your visit is in… Your preconditions are due…
Spring 2011 September 15, 2009
Fall 2011 February 1, 2010
Spring 2012 September 15, 2010
Fall 2012 February 1, 2011
Spring 2013 September 15, 2011
Fall 2013 February 1, 2012
 
back to the top back to the top 
 
 
Updated May 8, 2009
Frequently Asked Questions about Preconditions
My institution is already accredited and is coming up for its next visit. Do I need to submit preconditions?
Who reviews the preconditions?
How will I know whether my preconditions have been met?
What happens after the preconditions are met?
How long should the conceptual framework be?
What if I can’t have my preconditions in by the deadline?
What if I still have questions about preconditions?
 
 
 
My institution is already accredited and is coming up for its next visit. Do I need to submit preconditions?
No, preconditions are required only of institutions seeking NCATE accreditation for the first time. However, your conceptual framework should be evident in the exhibit room. Also, depending on your state’s partnership agreement with NCATE, you may be required to submit program reviews approximately one year before the visit.
 
 
Who reviews the preconditions?

The Annual Report and Preconditions Audit Committee, comprised of representatives from NCATE constituent organizations, reviews Precondition #4, the conceptual framework. ARPA reviews Precondition #8 documentation when the institution is not eligible for institutional accreditation. NCATE staff review the others.

 
 
How will I know whether my preconditions have been met?
After an institution’s preconditions documents are reviewed, NCATE sends the institution a report indicating whether the preconditions have been satisfied. If some preconditions are not met, the institution is asked to submit additional information. Precondition #7 is considered met once the institution has submitted the required program reports.
 
 
What happens after the preconditions are met?
Once all preconditions are met, the institution is nominated as a formal candidate for NCATE accreditation by NCATE’s Unit Accreditation Board at its next meeting (April or October). The institution is then eligible for an on-site visit, and the dates of that visit are officially confirmed. In addition, the institution is authorized to advise its constituents that it has met its preconditions and is actively seeking NCATE accreditation. The Unit Accreditation Board must establish formal candidacy before an on-site visit may take place.
 
On-site visits normally occur one to two years after formal candidacy has been granted. Postponement beyond that period must be requested in writing and cannot extend beyond a five-year period. After five years, the institution must reinstate the process of establishing candidacy.
 
 
How long should the conceptual framework be?
The Unit Accreditation Board recommends that the conceptual framework be no longer than 40 pages, including tables and appendices.
 
 
 
What if I can’t have my preconditions in by the deadline?
If you miss the deadline, your documents will not be reviewed by the Annual Report and Preconditions Audit Committee at its next meeting. This will delay your institution’s advancement to candidacy and could ultimately postpone your visit.
 
 
 
What if I still have questions about preconditions?
Please contact Donna Gollnick, Senior Vice President, at (202) 466-7496 or donna@ncate.org.
 
back to the top back to the top 
 
 
Updated June 17, 2005
 
Sample Conceptual Frameworks
 Adobe Acrobat Document Our Lady of Holy Cross (LA)
 MS Word Document University of Arkansas-Fort Smith
 Adobe Acrobat Document Montana State University—Northern (MT)
 Adobe Acrobat Document New York City College of Technology
 Adobe Acrobat Document Virginia State University (VA)
 Adobe Acrobat Document Concordia College
 
back to the top back to the top 
 
 
Updated July 27, 2009
Frequently Cited Concerns About Precondition #4
1. Sometimes, a document contains all of the necessary "pieces," but it does not read as a cohesive narrative written in one voice.
 
2. Alignment. Sometimes it is not clear how
  • the proficiencies in 4.4 align with the goals in 4.2.
  • the proficiencies in 4.4 align with state standards. (Alignment with professional standards can be mentioned in a sentence and verified through state or national program reviews.)
  • the assessments in 4.5 align with the proficiencies in 4.4.
 
3. Organization. The document should be easily understood by individuals outside the institution. It might help to have someone outside the institution read a draft to check for this. Regardless of how you choose to organize the document, it should be clear which sections relate to which element of the conceptual framework (4.1-4.5).
 
Common problems with specific elements:
 
4. The unit’s mission and vision are provided, but not the institution’s, or vice versa (4.1).
 
5. The unit’s philosophy is not described. (In other words, 4.2 sometimes includes goals/outcomes/institutional standards without describing their philosophical basis.)
 
6. Some of the references cited in the narrative of 4.3 are not included in the reference list. Or, some of the works in the reference list are not mentioned in the narrative. (Less frequently, a concern is cited because a reference list was not provided at all.)
 
7. The unit has not identified specific proficiencies indicating what candidates should know and be able to do (4.4). The proficiencies should be more specific than the institutional goals/standards in 4.2.
 
8. Some of the information needed to understand 4.5 is provided in precondition #5. The conceptual framework (precondition #4) should be a self-contained document that can be understood on its own.
 
9. For further information regarding Precondition #4, institutions should see the NCATE unit standards document, which provides a detailed discussion of the conceptual framework. Documentation #4.5 is a description or summary of the unit’s system for assessing whether candidates meet the proficiencies outlined in #4.4, not a detailed statement of the unit’s entire assessment system. The description should include, at a minimum, an indication of when candidates in the unit or in a given program are assessed; the type of assessment(s) used; how the unit ensures the assessments are or will be accurate and consistent; and the consequences for candidates performing at different levels on the assessments.
 
back to the top back to the top