Public
General Public
Current & Future Teachers
Researchers & Reporters
Standards
Governance
Publications
Testimonials
Job Vacancies
Member Login
"The unbiased, external nature of the NCATE procedures provides Maryland with high stakes decisionmaking that is objective and separate from state policies. Maryland applauds NCATE for its leadership in performance-based decisionmaking in the accreditation of teacher education institutions. "
Nancy Grasmick, State Superintendent, Maryland
   more testimonials
Upcoming Web-seminars
Highlights from 2008 Survey of NCATE Institutions
 
About NCATE Standards List of Accredited Institutions Publications Contact Directory Site Map
Accreditation Decisions After the First Visit
Accreditation Decisions After the First Visit:
 
After an institution’s first accreditation visit, the UAB will render one of the following accreditation decisions:
 
Accreditation. This accreditation decision indicates that the unit meets each of the six NCATE standards for unit accreditation. Areas for improvement may be cited, indicating problems warranting the institution’s attention. In its subsequent annual reports, the unit may describe progress made in addressing the areas for improvement cited in NCATE’s action report. The next on-site visit is scheduled for five years following the semester of the accreditation visit. First accreditation is retroactive to the semester or quarter in which the on-site visit occurred
 
Adobe Acrobat Document Provisional Accreditation. This accreditation decision indicates that the unit has not met one or more of the standards. When the UAB renders this decision, the unit has accredited status, but must satisfy provisions by meeting previously unmet standard(s).
 
If provisional accreditation is granted, the UAB will require (1) submission of documentation that addresses the unmet standard(s) within six months of the accreditation decision or (2) a focused visit on the unmet standard(s) within two years* of the semester that the provisional accreditation decision was granted. When a decision is made by the UAB to require submission of documentation, the institution may choose to waive that option in favor of a focused visit within two years* of the semester that the provisional accreditation decision was made.
 
If documentation is submitted under the terms specified in the above paragraph, the UAB will decide to (1) grant accreditation or (2) require a focused visit within one year of the semester in which the documentation was submitted. If a focused visit occurs, within the timeframes as specified above, the UAB will decide to (1) grant accreditation or (2) revoke accreditation.
 

If accreditation is granted, the next on-site visit is scheduled for five years following the semester in which the first accreditation visit occurred.

 

In cases where the UAB grants provisional accreditation solely because of concerns with test scores, the UAB will require submission of documentation that addresses the unmet standard within two years* of the semester that the provisional accreditation decision was granted. If documentation is submitted under these terms, the UAB will decide to (1) continue accreditation or (2) revoke accreditation. If accreditation is continued, the next on-site visit is scheduled for five years following the semester in which the accreditation visit occurred.

 
Denial of Accreditation. This accreditation decision indicates that the unit does not meet one or more of the NCATE standards, and has pervasive problems that limit its capacity to offer quality programs that adequately prepare candidates.
 
Revocation of Accreditation. Following a comprehensive site visit that occurs as a result of a UAB decision to accredit with probation, this accreditation decision indicates that the unit does not meet one or more of the NCATE standards, and has pervasive problems that limit its capacity to offer quality programs that adequately prepare candidates.
 

Following a focused visit that occurs as a result of a UAB decision to accredit with conditions, this accreditation decision indicates that the unit has not sufficiently addressed the unmet standard(s).

For additional circumstances under which accreditation can be revoked , please see NCATE’s Revocation Policy.

 
Appeals of Accreditation Decisions. For information regarding appeals, please see NCATE’s Appeals of Accreditation Decisions policies
 
rev. 10/04
 
back to the top back to the top