Public
General Public
Current & Future Teachers
Researchers & Reporters
Standards
Governance
Publications
Testimonials
Job Vacancies
Member Login
"Because NCATE's national standards are developed by the education profession together with the states, all key stakeholders are represented"
Jan Amator, Deputy Associate Superintendent for Highly Qualified Professionals, Arizona
   more testimonials
Upcoming Web-seminars
Highlights from 2008 Survey of NCATE Institutions
 
About NCATE Standards List of Accredited Institutions Publications Contact Directory Site Map
Guidelines for the Focused Visit
Updated May 2, 2006
The Unit Accreditation Board (UAB) may grant provisional accreditation to units seeking first accreditation or accreditation with conditions to institutions seeking continuing accreditation. See First Accreditation Decisions and Continuing Accreditation Decisions. When the UAB grants provisional accreditation or accreditation with conditions, it can require the unit to undergo a focused visit or submit documentation to address the unmet standard(s). In instances in which the Unit Accreditation Board requests a focused visit, the visit must be scheduled by the institution and must take place within two years of the date of the provisional or conditional decision. Procedures for preparing for the focused visit are available in the accompanying Timeline for Focused Visits. Additional information is provided below.
 
Length of the Visit
 
The length of the visit will be shorter than a regular visit, usually Sunday to Tuesday. NCATE staff and the unit will determine the length of the visit. The length of the visit can be altered following the previsit if circumstances suggest that a change is warranted.
 
Focused Institutional Report
 
The focused institutional report is similar to a regular institutional report in that it contains an overview of the institution and a description of the unit’s conceptual framework. Instead of including evidence for meeting each standard, however, it includes evidence for meeting each standard that was previously not met. The focused institutional report should be no longer than 25 pages, with most of the pages devoted to the previously unmet standard(s). The report must address the entire unmet standard(s), element by element, including any previously cited areas for improvement. Institutions should refer to the Handbook for Accreditation Visits section on institutional reports for information that applies both to institutional reports and focused institutional reports.
 
Preparations for the Visit
 
Information in the Handbook for Accreditation Visits applies, with the understanding that the unit will be preparing for a smaller team.
 
Program Reviews
 
Institutions are not required to submit program reviews in preparation for a focused visit. However, units may, if they wish, present additional information from program reviews as evidence for meeting Standard 1.
 
Third Party Testimony
 
It is not necessary for institutions preparing for a focused visit to publish a “Call for Comment” inviting third-party testimony.
 
Size of the BOE Team
 
At least three BOE members are assigned to a team for a focused visit, with the size of the team dependent on the number of standards to be examined, the previously unmet standard(s), and the size and complexity of the unit.
 
Budget for the Visit
 
Institutions are required to pay a Periodic Evaluation Fee of $2,000 to $3,000 during the semester of their review by the Board of Examiners. The fee depends on the size of the team.
 
Focused BOE Report
 
The focused BOE report includes a cover page, table of contents, and summary of findings for the previously unmet standards. The focused BOE report also includes an introduction and brief description of the unit’s conceptual framework, as well as findings for each previously unmet standard. Similar to a regular BOE report, the focused BOE report includes sources of evidence and corrections (if any) to the focused institutional report. The report must address the entire unmet standard(s), element by element, and any previously cited areas for improvement should be identified as "corrected" or "continued." (New areas for improvement may also be cited). BOE members should refer to the Handbook for Accreditation Visits for information that applies both to BOE reports and focused BOE reports.
 
Possible Accreditation Decisions
 
If the unit (or the initial or advanced level programs within the unit) had been provisionally accredited before the focused visit, the Unit Accreditation Board (UAB) has the option to grant continued accreditation or to revoke accreditation. If the UAB grants continued accreditation, the next full accreditation visit will occur three years after the focused visit, in keeping with the five-year accreditation cycle for institutions accredited for the first time.

If the unit (or the initial or advanced level programs within the unit) had been accredited with conditions before the focused visit, the UAB has the option to grant continued accreditation or to revoke accreditation. If the UAB grants continued accreditation, the next full accreditation visit will occur five years after the focused visit, to return the institution to its regular seven-year accreditation cycle. (Some variations may occur in states that operate on a five-year accreditation cycle.)
 
State Partnerships
 
Focused visits will honor the state partnership context established for other accreditation visits.
 
back to the top back to the top